PulseSensor Research — Innovation Graph

Skip to the innovation graph

PulseSensor Research · Knowledge Base v1

Follow an idea from evidence to experiment.

Papers, patent disclosures, products, implementations, reproducible experiments, open questions, and roadmap projects belong in one connected view—not in separate silos.

47papers in Dr. Doyle’s bibliography
3existing research lanes preserved
857patent families in the first-pass landscape
23 + 6local patent PDFs; representative set plus pilot pack

Pilot topic · PPG-derived respiratory rate

Paper → patent → product → replication → roadmap

This pilot is a navigable example, not a claim of commercial lineage, scientific equivalence, patent coverage, or freedom to operate.

Scientific evidencePatent disclosureProduct / implementationReplicationRoadmap
Scientific evidence · 2024

Off-the-shelf PulseSensor study

Stevens et al. tested four PulseSensors and open-source software with 15 healthy adults in four positions. The best reported respiratory-rate combination reached Spearman ρ = 0.82 and mean difference 1.90 breaths/minute.

Limit: small, single-center cohort; movement and population generalization remain open.

Read the CC BY paper →
Patent disclosure overlay

Multiple technical paths, unequal legal status

Active screen: Owlet’s US 12,159,717 discloses a CNN → FFT → dense-layer respiratory-rate predictor.

Expired screen: US 7,881,790 discloses cycle-synchronized sparse sampling.

Abandoned screen: US 2013/0172759 discloses PPG monitoring in a narcotic-reversal system.

Compare disclosures and status →
Product / implementation

PulseSensor as an open research input

The current PulseSensor is a single-channel green-light reflectance PPG sensor with raw analog output. Stevens et al. selected it for access, wavelength, size, and cost.

Boundary: it does not measure SpO2 or blood pressure and is not medical equipment.

See the current kit →
Reproducible experiment

Quiet vs. gently paced breathing

Record synchronized raw PPG and a respiratory reference. Predefine windows, rejection rules, and metrics. Compare baseline wander, pulse-amplitude variation, and beat-interval variation.

Safety: no breath-holding or forced hyperventilation. Without a reference, report modulation—not respiratory-rate accuracy.

Open the experiment →
Roadmap project

Open respiratory-rate benchmark

Publish de-identified raw PPG, synchronized reference signals, participant-level train/test splits, signal-quality labels, code, and failure cases.

Decision gate: compare classical modulation fusion with learned models only after the reference and dataset protocol are fixed.

See the build plan →

Patent knowledge layer

Disclosure is not validation. Public access is not permission.

A patent can teach a technical approach without proving that the approach works. A paper can validate an experiment without deciding patent scope. Educational or noncommercial use does not automatically clear active patent rights.

Expired, lapsed, and abandoned records can be high-value buildable history, but only after the exact claims, jurisdiction, continuations, maintenance events, and other rights are checked. Active records belong in landscape and literacy work; product decisions may require patent counsel.

Active screening label
Landscape/literacy only. No clearance inference.
Expired/lapsed screening label
Potential buildable history; verify the exact jurisdiction and surviving family members.
Abandoned screening label
The abandoned application’s disclosure is public; related continuations or other rights may remain.
Status check
2026-08-01. Screening data, not a legal opinion. Verify in USPTO Patent Center →

The three lanes · preserved and connected

Start where your question starts.

The patent layer crosses all three lanes; it does not replace or isolate any of them.

How to read the graph

Separate what is known from what is suggested.

Each connection should expose its evidence type and uncertainty instead of letting proximity imply proof.

Verified fact

The 2024 study used PulseSensor hardware.

The paper reports four PulseSensors, Arduino Nano 33 IoT, 15 participants, four positions, and 15 respiratory-rate algorithm combinations.

Inference

The study makes a useful replication seed.

Its open hardware/software choices and stated methods make independent replication feasible. That is a planning inference, not proof that every setup will reproduce its results.

Legal uncertainty

Technical adjacency does not establish patent coverage.

The pilot’s patents are related by topic. No claim chart, infringement analysis, validity opinion, or freedom-to-operate conclusion has been made.

Pilot patent reading notes

What the documents actually disclose.

These are concise technical readings of public patent documents, checked against the local source pack.

US 12,159,717 B2 · Owlet Baby Care · screened active

Inventors Sean Kerman, Tanner Christensen, Chris Hettinger, and Jeffrey Humpherys disclose a learned pipeline that uses convolutional layers to identify/clean the PPG signal, an FFT layer to represent respiratory frequencies, and a dense layer to predict respiratory rate. The claims also describe derivative, clipping, normalization, and prior-rate template options.

Evidence limit: the document describes and claims a system; it does not replace independent validation across devices, populations, and motion conditions.

Official USPTO PDF → · Family/status screen →

US 7,881,790 B1 · Pacesetter · screened expired (fee-related)

Inventor Robert G. Turcott discloses reducing acquisition and processing by taking one hemodynamic sample per respiratory cycle at a consistent phase, optionally triggered by inspiration or expiration. The concept is historically useful for thinking about low-power, cycle-synchronized measurement.

Legal limit: the US record was screened as expired fee-related on 2026-08-01. Before building around a specific claim, check restoration, related family members, other jurisdictions, and any separate rights.

Official USPTO PDF → · Family/status screen →

US 2013/0172759 A1 · University of Florida Research Foundation · screened abandoned

Inventors Richard J. Melker and Donn M. Dennis disclose central-site PPG monitoring in a system that can trigger administration of a narcotic reversal agent when respiratory or other parameters cross preset bounds.

Evidence and safety limit: this is a high-stakes medical disclosure, not a PulseSensor project recommendation, a clinical validation result, or evidence that an adjacent use is legally clear. The application was screened abandoned; related rights require separate checking.

Official USPTO PDF → · Family/status screen →

Three additional active-screen technical records in the local pilot pack

US 10,206,612 B2: separates venous and arterial components from red/infrared PPG using second-order blind identification, then derives respiratory information and SpO2 from different components. US 11,304,654 B2: derives a respiratory signal, peak-to-valley values, and peak counts to detect abnormal respiration. US 9,066,680 B1: compares respiratory-rate estimates from multiple physiological inputs to express confidence.

These are distinct technical disclosures with distinct sensor assumptions. None independently validates a single-channel green PulseSensor implementation.

Patent-document handling: the site links to official public documents and reports short factual summaries. It does not republish full documents or figures. The local archive records source URLs, retrieval date, checksums, and screening caveats.

Reproducible experiment layer

Turn the pilot into evidence.

Use a synchronized respiratory reference if the question is accuracy. Without one, the safe question is whether breathing-related modulation is visible and repeatable.

Pre-registerQuestion, conditions, windows, exclusions, and metrics.
RecordRaw PPG, reference respiration, timestamps, posture, placement, and motion.
ExtractBaseline wander, amplitude modulation, and beat-interval/frequency modulation.
CompareAt least one transparent classical method and one alternative; preserve failures.
ReportParticipant-level results, rejected segments, uncertainty, code, and environment.
Human-participant gate: ask the teacher, sponsor, or institution before collecting data. Competition and institutional rules may require prior review, consent, or assent. Do not publish identifiable health data.

Roadmap project · research classification

Build an open respiratory-rate benchmark.

This is a future research project, not a current product capability.

Dataset contract

  • Raw single-channel green PPG
  • Synchronized respiratory reference
  • Posture, motion, placement, and signal-quality labels
  • Participant-level train/validation/test split

Method contract

  • Baseline wander, amplitude, and frequency modulation
  • Transparent classical baseline
  • Learned method only with leakage controls
  • Versioned code and fixed evaluation windows

Evidence contract

  • Error distribution, not only correlation
  • Performance by posture and signal quality
  • Failure cases and rejected windows
  • No medical-performance claim without the right study

Research-grade sourcing

Sources, dates, and boundaries.

Mutable status is dated. Links point to public records, published research, or existing PulseSensor pages.

Scientific pilot
Stevens et al., “A Guide to Measuring Heart and Respiratory Rates Based on Off-the-Shelf Photoplethysmographic Hardware and Open-Source Software,” Sensors 24 (2024) 3766. CC BY 4.0. DOI →
Algorithm evidence
Charlton et al. (2016) compared 314 ECG/PPG respiratory-rate algorithm combinations and reported limits of agreement; Pimentel et al. (2017) emphasized signal quality and independent validation. Charlton DOI → · Pimentel DOI →
Patent corpus
First-pass landscape retrieved 2026-07-31: 857 deduplicated family representatives from a title/abstract/claims PPG query; 23 representative PDFs plus 6 pilot PDFs. One ranked 100-record result page was unavailable. Status buckets are screening labels.
Pilot status
US patent records screened 2026-08-01 using public patent pages and official USPTO document PDFs. Exact status, term, claims, continuations, maintenance, and jurisdiction must be rechecked for a business decision.